Ford’s Weird 1980s Decisions: Why Did They Move The Horn There?

Madness Stalk Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Normally, I enjoy helping to give you new information, interesting facts you can roll about in your mind and savor and enjoy. This time, though, all I really have for you are more questions, more confusion, and a bit of genuine bafflement. It has to do, like so many of the things I bring to your attention, with a minor detail, really a footnote in the automotive world, but one I nevertheless think is important. It has to do with where Ford moved their horn controls on most of their cars from around 1980-ish to 1984. Most of us instinctively expect horns to be, ideally, in the center of the steering wheel, where it can be smacked or pounded by an unskilled, panicked, or wrathful fist. That’s where The Almighty Himself decreed it should go.

Unfortunately, humans being imperfect as they are, sometimes that horn control gets moved. On many old cars, it’s activated by a chrome ring; on later cars, buttons on the steering wheel activate the horn. And, sometimes, if we stray far enough from the Lord’s healing light, that horn control can end up perched on the end of a silly stalk, sticking out of the side of the steering column, shared with more natural stalk-dwelling controls like turn indicators or headlight dimmers.

And that’s exactly what Ford did. Really, look at this stalk from an ’83 Mustang:

Stalk Stang

…or an ’82-’84 Escort:

Stalk1

They really did this. Ford moved the horn from the steering wheel center to the turn signal stalk, where you had to push it sideways to honk the horn.

This decision is incredible and baffling to me. Why did Ford choose this? Precisely 0.00% of Americans wanted this change, and if you don’t believe me, I’ll be the first to hop in the seat next to you in your time machine to go back to the ’80s and prove it. We can kill baby Hitler on the way back, it’ll be fine.

The only explanation I’ve ever heard for the change is that Ford wanted their cars to feel a bit more European, and, in that sense, it barely makes sense, because, yes, if you were going to find the stalk-horn anywhere, it’d be on European cars. The French especially seemed to like it; here’s a diagram of a Renault Dauphine’s controls, and it has a (two-tone, even) horn that is sounded by pushing the stalk towards the steering column:

Dauphine Horn

I have owned a car with the stalk-horn setup, my old Reliant Scimitar. I loved that car, but I was never able to get used to that dumb horn-honking method. It never felt right! Of all the controls on a car, the one that inspires the most visceral and physical reactions has to be the horn. You go for the horn in moments of alarm or distress, when some idiot is about to sideswipe you changing lanes or some dummy on a scooter almost bolts out in front of you, and in these moments you just want to smack something and make a loud sound; hence why the center-of-steering-wheel horn setup remains the ideal.

Myscim

The small fussiness of the turn signal stalk coupled with the strange action of pushing it sideways into the steering column makes this horn-honking method terrible. Sure, it’s fine for calm, controlled, friendly tootles, daintily done with fingertips, but that’s not when you need your horn the most.

I just don’t get this strange decision. And Ford didn’t just keep it to their affordable brands; even Lincoln was forced down this dark path:

Olds

… but Ford, at least for those couple of years, did seem to be really leaning into the horn stalk, since it ended up on so many models of their cars (think Panther-platforms, Mustangs and other Fox platforms, Escorts, Fairmonts, and more) and trucks.

By 1984 it was gone, as quickly and mysteriously as it appeared, I suspect screamed out of existence by frustrated owners brandishing snapped-off horn/signal stalks at their local Ford dealers.

I’d love to know the actual reasons why Ford made this decision, but so far I haven’t found anything. I reached out to Ford and see if there’s any further insight to be had, and, if there is, I’ll be sure to update everyone. Was it preparation for airbags in the wheel? Maybe, but there were many other solutions for that, and, besides, none of these cars actually had airbags in their steering wheels.

At this moment, the origin of the horn-stalk remains a mystery, but I’m hopeful for some spirited discussion in the comments that may help us understand this odd choice a bit better. Also, if anyone actually prefers a horn on the stalk, now’s the time to speak up, because I sure as hell would love to hear a defense of this madness.

 

Relatedbar

Ford Just Used An Over-The-Air Upgrade To Make New Mustangs That Much Cooler

Europe Is Requiring Physical Buttons For Cars To Get Top Safety Marks, And We Should, Too

These Ferrari Warning Lights Seem To Demand The Impossible

129 thoughts on “Ford’s Weird 1980s Decisions: Why Did They Move The Horn There?

  1. I wonder is the notion of Europeans politely tooting their horn vs Yanks aggressively honking theirs a direct correlation of horn switch placement.

  2. Had this in a 1991 Peugeot 405. Weirdly, the horn wasn’t activated by the very button shaped round button on the end of the stalk being depressed, but by the whole stalk going into the steering column and depressing something deep in there

  3. Had this in a 1991 Peugeot 405. Weirdly, the horn wasn’t activated by the very button shaped round button on the end of the stalk being depressed, but by the whole stalk going into the steering column and depressing something deep in there

    1. Except cruise control was an option with the buttons actually on the wheel and that required the same contacts behind the steering wheel.

    1. Except cruise control was an option with the buttons actually on the wheel and that required the same contacts behind the steering wheel.

  4. i think it’s because most of the cars in Europe at the time had the horn on the stalk. Some of them even had different stalks for the lights/horn and turn signals on different stacks on the same side of the column

  5. i think it’s because most of the cars in Europe at the time had the horn on the stalk. Some of them even had different stalks for the lights/horn and turn signals on different stacks on the same side of the column

  6. My 1988 Jaguar XJ6 also has a stalk-mounted horn. Fortunately the aftermarket Momo steering wheel makes it blindingly obvious that there is no horn in the center, so it’s easier to remember if I ever one day have reason to honk the horn other than to prove it still works.

    1. Which is interesting, because the pre-XJ40 cars were “normal” horn locations. So in Jaguar’s case, that very well may have a been an issue of airbags.

      In my “we for like men” MGB, the horn is on the stalk.

  7. My 1988 Jaguar XJ6 also has a stalk-mounted horn. Fortunately the aftermarket Momo steering wheel makes it blindingly obvious that there is no horn in the center, so it’s easier to remember if I ever one day have reason to honk the horn other than to prove it still works.

    1. Which is interesting, because the pre-XJ40 cars were “normal” horn locations. So in Jaguar’s case, that very well may have a been an issue of airbags.

      In my “we for like men” MGB, the horn is on the stalk.

  8. The primary advantage of the stalk setup is that as you’re honking the horn, you can turn on your brights and/or your turn signal, thus giving optimal visual and aural attention to the situation. All the panic at your fingertips.

    If all that commotion still doesn’t work, it’s likely the stalk has now broken off in your hand and you can use it to stab the offending individual in the eye.

  9. The primary advantage of the stalk setup is that as you’re honking the horn, you can turn on your brights and/or your turn signal, thus giving optimal visual and aural attention to the situation. All the panic at your fingertips.

    If all that commotion still doesn’t work, it’s likely the stalk has now broken off in your hand and you can use it to stab the offending individual in the eye.

  10. I always thought they were prepping for driver’s-side airbags. Early on, there were a lot of different solutions to the ‘how to honk the horn through the airbag hub’ challenge, and maybe this was a trial balloon.

    I also wonder if this isn’t why GM started putting so many buttons on the wheel hub (Pontiac 6000, etc.) at the time. It would be great practice for engineering and assembling steering columns with clock springs in them, and testing the durability of those springs not on a safety device, but on secondary controls that had a primary backup right on the dash.

  11. I always thought they were prepping for driver’s-side airbags. Early on, there were a lot of different solutions to the ‘how to honk the horn through the airbag hub’ challenge, and maybe this was a trial balloon.

    I also wonder if this isn’t why GM started putting so many buttons on the wheel hub (Pontiac 6000, etc.) at the time. It would be great practice for engineering and assembling steering columns with clock springs in them, and testing the durability of those springs not on a safety device, but on secondary controls that had a primary backup right on the dash.

  12. My parents had a Fairmont with the stalk-horn. I agree it was dumb. I can only speculate as to why Ford did this, but that means I can speculate, and this being the comments section, I will: It was about money.

    The Fairmont was such a cost-engineered piece of crap they must have designed every penny out of it that they could. And although the hub-mounted horn switch was obviously well-established tech at that point, I can imagine the assembly is marginally finickier than what they went with, resulting in higher labor costs. As it was, I well remember that the decorative cap in the hub was just held in place by a couple of springy clips (like a hubcap), and would easily pop off.

    1. Bought a Fairmont in 78. From the get-go, that horn relocation was thought of as a strange and unnecessary design decision, unfriendly to drivers.

  13. My parents had a Fairmont with the stalk-horn. I agree it was dumb. I can only speculate as to why Ford did this, but that means I can speculate, and this being the comments section, I will: It was about money.

    The Fairmont was such a cost-engineered piece of crap they must have designed every penny out of it that they could. And although the hub-mounted horn switch was obviously well-established tech at that point, I can imagine the assembly is marginally finickier than what they went with, resulting in higher labor costs. As it was, I well remember that the decorative cap in the hub was just held in place by a couple of springy clips (like a hubcap), and would easily pop off.

    1. Bought a Fairmont in 78. From the get-go, that horn relocation was thought of as a strange and unnecessary design decision, unfriendly to drivers.

  14. My mom drove an ’81 Ford LTD Crown Victoria with the horn stalk. If you hit it hard enough, it would stick and the horn would blare until you got it unstuck. Fun times.

  15. My mom drove an ’81 Ford LTD Crown Victoria with the horn stalk. If you hit it hard enough, it would stick and the horn would blare until you got it unstuck. Fun times.

  16. Related, how about the frequent oddness of hazard light switch placement on same era domestics?

    For decades, the Big 3 insisted on putting them in out of the way, non-obvious places, often barely (if at all) labeled as such. I remember the first time sitting in a European car and being amazed with the obvious-what-it-is red triangle button RIGHT THERE.

    My Mom’s ’80s Chevy Celebrity, by contrast, had the switch on the underside of the steering column.

    1. My Econoline had it on top of the steering column, which is at least theoretically visible (albeit less so when you’re seated properly), but I much prefer how it’s implemented on my Prius as a nice big button on the top-middle-ish of the dash.

      1. My UK 1988 Ford Escort had that. And my father’s Ford Sierra. Not good for hitting it in a hurry in an e.g. emergency braking situation.

        1. Exactly. “Gee, I sure hope nothing would cause the steering wheel to turn quickly while I reach through it to push this button that should make me less likely to be hit…”

          Like any video game that makes you go through a crushing machine assembly line to get to the button that disables the crushing machine.

          1. My 2000s era Fords both have this setup, still. AND they’re tiny, same-color-as-the-column buttons no less, though with tiny red triangles on them at least.

    2. Steering column was pretty normal placement for hazards on domestic cars for a long time. My 71 Chev had it on the bottom, my 95 Chev has it on top, my 77 Cherokee has it on the side, etc.

    3. I distinctly remember my dad leaving 8 year old me in his ’85 Buick Park Avenue while he was shopping, me turning on the hazards using the weird GM switch under the column, then not being able to figure out how to turn them off. When my dad returned to the car I was crying and I totally recall him laughing when he found out why I was crying and easily turned off the lights.

      1. You’ve jarred my memory – they had this spring-loaded collar around the button that you’d pull down to pop the button out/back to off!

  17. Related, how about the frequent oddness of hazard light switch placement on same era domestics?

    For decades, the Big 3 insisted on putting them in out of the way, non-obvious places, often barely (if at all) labeled as such. I remember the first time sitting in a European car and being amazed with the obvious-what-it-is red triangle button RIGHT THERE.

    My Mom’s ’80s Chevy Celebrity, by contrast, had the switch on the underside of the steering column.

    1. My Econoline had it on top of the steering column, which is at least theoretically visible (albeit less so when you’re seated properly), but I much prefer how it’s implemented on my Prius as a nice big button on the top-middle-ish of the dash.

      1. My UK 1988 Ford Escort had that. And my father’s Ford Sierra. Not good for hitting it in a hurry in an e.g. emergency braking situation.

        1. Exactly. “Gee, I sure hope nothing would cause the steering wheel to turn quickly while I reach through it to push this button that should make me less likely to be hit…”

          Like any video game that makes you go through a crushing machine assembly line to get to the button that disables the crushing machine.

          1. My 2000s era Fords both have this setup, still. AND they’re tiny, same-color-as-the-column buttons no less, though with tiny red triangles on them at least.

    2. Steering column was pretty normal placement for hazards on domestic cars for a long time. My 71 Chev had it on the bottom, my 95 Chev has it on top, my 77 Cherokee has it on the side, etc.

    3. I distinctly remember my dad leaving 8 year old me in his ’85 Buick Park Avenue while he was shopping, me turning on the hazards using the weird GM switch under the column, then not being able to figure out how to turn them off. When my dad returned to the car I was crying and I totally recall him laughing when he found out why I was crying and easily turned off the lights.

      1. You’ve jarred my memory – they had this spring-loaded collar around the button that you’d pull down to pop the button out/back to off!

  18. My college girlfriend and now ex-wife had an 82 escort wagon automatic. I think the horn was on that stalk. I just know that car was terrible in every way.

    1. 81 escort hatch 4-spd. terrible doesn’t begin to cover it. TBF the original owner did literally no maintenance through the 60K miles until i got it (not even oil, tires or brakes).

      I also briefly went out with a college classmate with an auto wagon (not sure if it was an 82, but probably not the same woman) and hers seemed nicer than mine, except that we had to blast the cabin heat at red lights in July and August to delay the engine overheating until we got up to speed.

  19. My college girlfriend and now ex-wife had an 82 escort wagon automatic. I think the horn was on that stalk. I just know that car was terrible in every way.

    1. 81 escort hatch 4-spd. terrible doesn’t begin to cover it. TBF the original owner did literally no maintenance through the 60K miles until i got it (not even oil, tires or brakes).

      I also briefly went out with a college classmate with an auto wagon (not sure if it was an 82, but probably not the same woman) and hers seemed nicer than mine, except that we had to blast the cabin heat at red lights in July and August to delay the engine overheating until we got up to speed.

Leave a Reply