The Ford Switchgear Concept Is The Raptorized F-150 Lightning That Ford Could Build Tomorrow

Raptorized Ligtning Switchgear
ADVERTISEMENT

Work trucks have been built to handle off-road duties for eons. After all, there are plenty of jobs to be done off the beaten trail. However, it’s really only in the last decade or so that we’ve seen a huge ramp-up in the world of performance off-road trucks. Models like the F-150 Raptor and Ram TRX came out with a combination of bonkers power and ruggedized suspension for charging hard through the rough stuff. Now, Ford looks set to bring the same concept to bear on electric trucks. Enter the Ford F-150 Lightning Switchgear.

It’s a slightly confusing name, I won’t lie. We’re not talking about the switches and buttons in the F-150 Lightning. Switchgear is the name of this special concept that’s built for rapid progress in ugly, bumpy terrain. To that end, Ford is revealing the F-150 Lightning Switchgear to the public at King of the Hammers on January 25, where the biggest and baddest off-road brawlers come to play. It’s wearing a bold Ford Performance livery to the grand ball, so you’re certainly not going to miss it in the crowd.

The Switchgear has been given exactly the kind of hardcore makeover we love to see. It’s got a widened track compared to the regular F-150 Lightning, complete with big rubber tucked under massive flared wheel arches. Naturally, it’s been lifted, too. Suspension-wise, it’s got 3-inch diameter Fox shocks, with the fatter units better able to handle bigger hits. Suspension travel is a full 11 inches up front, and 13 inches at the rear.

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 1

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 3

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 43

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 37

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 40
Big Fox shocks help soak up the impact from massive landings.

The drivetrain itself remains unchanged from the stock F-150 Lightning. It delivers a healthy 580 horsepower and 775 pound-feet of torque from dual motors driving all four wheels.

Ford actually built two distinct configurations for the Switchgear. The off-road version rocks 18-inch wheels with beadlocks, with 37-inch Nitto Ridge Grapplers. Oh, and rock rails and a spare wheel rack. To further aid ground clearance and approach and departure angles, it wears unique front and rear bumpers, too. The suspension has droop limiting straps front and rear for keeping everything cushdy when getting air over whoops at speed. It sits high with a full 13.5 inches of ride height up front, and 11 inches at the rear.

In contrast, the street version gets a sweet carbon composite front bumper with a wide air dam. Its side skirts are made of the same material, and it gets a tonneau cover to complete the look. It wears larger 20-inch wheels wrapped in Nitto NT420Vs—a popular luxury truck and SUV tire. It sits much lower, with 7 inches of ride height up front and 5 inches at the rear.

The Switchgear was built as a collaborative effort. Ford Performance pitched in on the build with Vaughn Gittin Jr. and RTR Vehicles. It’s not the first time the Ford and RTR have worked together; the latter company was behind the F-150 RTR Ultimate Funhaver concept from 2016.

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 39

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 27

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 22

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 15

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 10

F 150 Lightning Switchgear 6

It’s another great entry into the Ford Performance Demonstrator stable. It lines up against builds like the SuperVan 4.2, Mustang Mach-E 1400, and the F-100 Eluminator. These vehicles serve a marketing purpose, to be sure, but they’re also an opportunity for Ford’s engineers to experiment with that’s possible. The company credits this “playground for engineers” with helping it advance its knowledge and experience in the EV space.

We love it when automakers actually build interesting ideas instead of just leaving them on the drawing board. The Switchgear isn’t the most outrageous by any means; it’s a suspension kit and a few ruggedizing upgrades on an otherwise-normal electric truck. It might not have four-digit horsepower or the ability to cross the English Channel built in, but not every concept has to shoot for the moon. This one tells us that Ford is already thinking about a more performance-oriented electric truck, and that has to be a good thing.

Image credits: Ford

About the Author

View All My Posts

38 thoughts on “The Ford Switchgear Concept Is The Raptorized F-150 Lightning That Ford Could Build Tomorrow

  1. Sorry, but when I hear the word “switchgear”, I imagine the electrical panels I operated at a power plant, as well as repairing when I worked at another company.

  2. Is the name supposed to be ironic? EVs are doing away with switchgear as much as possible. Or maybe it’s aspirational, Ford’s way of saying “bring back switchgear!” which is a message I heartily endorse.

  3. Seriously curious what would need to be done to counteract flex that could damage the battery cells in a hoon machine like this. I assume they had to tweak something to ensure they didn’t twist the pack and get real hot real fast.

  4. So no pictures of the mentioned “street” version?

    Anyways, 20″ wheels on the “street” version is ridiculous for anything meant to leave the pavement.

    Ford couldn’t quite sell this tomorrow, because you couldn’t just move raptor suspension over to a lightning. I imagine the front suspension is interchangeable but the lightning uses an independent rear totally different from the solid axle in gas f150s including raptors.

    1. Sure looks like a hydro rear brake. Could also be a trail brake, which is a similar looking device that some people put on rock crawlers, push the handle forwards for right side brakes and back for left side brakes. Helps you turn tighter in poor traction.

      1. Ford has been putting big ol ebrake handles on stuff so it
        s undoubtedly either a hydro brake or big handle for the electronic rear parking brake.

    1. GM: We want everyone to be excited about EVs because we want to be first to the future!
      General Public: Yeah! We totally are already because there’s already some really cool ones on the road. But an affordable one would be great! Like a new Nissan Leaf.
      GM: Like this? *makes the Bolt*
      GP: Yes!!!
      GM: Well, go fuck yourself, here’s a new Hummer. And we’re taking away the Bolt.

      1. As someone who works upstream in the automotive supply chain from Ford, I’ll believe Ford’s sales forecasts when me shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

        1. As someone who works upstream in the automotive supply chain from Ford, I’ll believe Ford’s sales forecasts when me shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

          Regardless of their sales *forecasts*, actual Lightning sales set a new sales record, by far, in Q4, so the claim I responded to: “no demand” for Lightnings, is not correct.

        1. Yes, that article supports exactly what I said.

          Sales are way up.

          The company sold 20,365 electric trucks through November of this year, marking a 54 percent increase over last year. It also achieved its highest month of sales yet, selling 4393 of the electric truck in November.

          And the production GOAL was halved, not current production. The production goal is still 50% higher than the record sale rate they set for Q4.

          Ford reportedly told suppliers to expect an average volume of roughly 1600 Lightnings per week at its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, Michigan, beginning in January. That figure is half of the 3200 Lightnings that Ford had previously expected to produce, with the ultimate goal of building 150k/yr.

          1. You can spin it however you like – I’ve worked in automotive & dealt with changing forecasts for 20 years now…but cutting forecasts in half isn’t a positive when it comes to demand.

            Sure, sales are up compared to the prior year (2022) – they didn’t start production until April of that year!

            I’m a fan of the lightning, so I’m not even sure what we’re arguing here. I’d just rather see them working on the affordability of the thing vs. another overpriced off-road variant.

            1. Sure, sales are up compared to the prior year (2022) – they didn’t start production until April of that year!

              Lies, damn lies, and…that other one. What was it? 😉

            2. You can spin it however you like

              My point is that if I’m spinning it positively, you’re spinning it negatively by claiming there’s “no demand” for Lightnings, when they have just had, by far, their best quarter ever and are beating their original forecast rate.

              – I’ve worked in automotive & dealt with changing forecasts for 20 years now…but cutting forecasts in half isn’t a positive when it comes to demand.

              That’s true, they cut forecasts for 2024, but that’s AFTER they doubled forecasts twice. They’re already beating their original forecast of ~30-40k/yr rate. They probably went too high when they doubled it twice (not knowing interest rates would go so high, for one), so they’ve pulled back forecasts, but still way above the original forecast.

              Sure, sales are up compared to the prior year (2022) – they didn’t start production until April of that year!

              I grabbed the whole paragraph from C&D, but the real point is the second half: They had their best month in November, despite many other months of production. They had their 2nd or 3rd best month in December, and their best quarter in Q4, despite other full quarters to compare to. Yes, comparing a whole year to a 2/3 year isn’t apples-to-apples, but “best month” or “best quarter” is fairly comparable.

              I’m a fan of the lightning, so I’m not even sure what we’re arguing here.

              I’m arguing that your original comment is misleading regarding the claim of “no demand” when they’re beating their original estimates, setting sales records, etc.

              Clearly, Ford hoped they’d be selling even better after doubling forecasts twice, but they’re still selling pretty well.

              I’d just rather see them working on the affordability of the thing vs. another overpriced off-road variant.

              I agree that affordability is an issue, but it’s also worth nothing that affordability is a problem with trucks, in general. The base Lightning (Supercrew 4×4) is the same price, after available tax credit, as the absolute cheapest, weakest, zero-option gas F-150 Supercrew 4×4. It’s VERY competitively priced.

  5. What a stupid name. I used to work at GE where they built switchgear, and it is not adventure-inspiring stuff. Of course a large portion of the population doesn’t even know what switchgear is, so they won’t know any better..

    1. Agree. So many other good options (or at least options):

      The Ford F150:
      Amped-Up Edition
      Overload
      Shock Factor
      Lightning Strike
      Corona Effect
      Spark-Gap
      Current Dump

    2. Came here to say this. I’ve installed many a section. I’d totally love to drive a massive, hugely heavy gray box with all kinds of either delicate or dangerous (or both!) parts inside

Leave a Reply