What is a muscle car? Merriam-Webster defines it as “any of a group of American-made 2-door sports coupes with powerful engines designed for high-performance driving,” but given that the industry’s preferred method of propulsion is changing, can the muscle car change with it? The 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona is determined to find out, because not only is it a big, quick American coupe, it’s also powered by batteries.
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona. Previewed by a concept car that made the rounds in 2022 and teased rather liberally early this year, we’ve had plenty of time to prepare for Dodge to dish the details on its make-or-break next-generation Windsor-built family car, and the first two trim levels are finally here.
Back up a second, Windsor? The one across the border from Detroit? The minivan plant? Yes, but this isn’t the first time Windsor’s ever built Chargers. From 1975 to 1978, Dodge’s B-body coupe was bolted together in the Windsor Assembly Plant, making this 2024 car something of a homecoming.
The Charger, Recharged
Dodge has a rich history of trim names, and it’s chosen the Daytona banner to use for all electric Charger variants, with the R/T and Scat Pack trims being the first to arrive (so the full names are “Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack” and “Dodge Charger Daytona R/T”). Both of these initial models feature a 400-volt architecture, so the peak DC fast charging rate taps out at 183 kW. With 93.9 kWh of usable battery pack capacity (100.5 total), you’re going to be waiting just over 52 minutes to charge from 5 to 80 percent once you run down the estimated range of 317 miles on the R/T and 260 miles on the Scat Pack.
Speaking of batteries, we’re looking at a 104S2P pack, meaning two parallel sets of 104 cells arranged in series, that uses prismatic cells. Dodge claims a litany of benefits from going prismatic over cylindrical or pouch cells. As per the automaker:
The battery cell structure is prismatic, offering a more structurally stable cell with better thermal performance through a rigid casing, resulting in lower battery temperatures during high performance driving. The nickel cobalt aluminum chemistry of the battery cell provides more power per gram — the battery-electric version of high-octane fuel.
Nickel cobalt aluminum (NCA) cells are desirable for their power density, often at or above 200 watt-hours per kilogram. They might not be as resilient as lithium iron phosphate cells, but they pack one hell of a punch, which is why companies like Dodge and Tesla use them in EVs. By the way, Dodge claims that the pack in the Charger Daytona offers “a peak discharge rate of 550 kW — specifically designed to maximize acceleration by allowing the motor to utilize the most power the battery can output in the span of a quarter mile.” Nice.
While we’re on the subject of goings-on under the skin, it’s worth noting that the Charger Daytona is Dodge’s first application of the STLA Large platform. The automaker is throwing the buzzword “BEV-native” at this platform, but for the sake of clarity, STLA Large is a flexible architecture made to accept longitudinal combustion power and skateboard electric power.
This also means that the Charger no longer draws inspiration from Y2K Mercedes-Benzes for its suspension geometry, now riding on a multi-link setup in the front and an integral link setup out back, the latter of which is named so because it controls caster using a compact and clever vertical integral link on each corner, eliminating the need for a space-robbing trailing arm and offering superior kinematic control, so long as rear axle steering isn’t desired.
Fortunately, once a Charger Daytona is done juicing up, it should be hellaciously quick thanks to a 250 kW motor with an integrated inverter and 11:1 gearset on each axle. Yep, this thing’s all-wheel-drive, and the front motor can effectively free-wheel when desired to boost efficiency. The Scat Pack trim cranks out 630 horsepower, which temporarily climbs to 670 horsepower when the Power Shot button on the steering wheel is pressed (see above). Dodge says the Scat Pack’s good for zero-to-60 mph in 3.3 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11.5 seconds. That’s nigh-on Hellcat quick, although given how tricky it is to launch a Hellcat, expect the Charger Daytona Scat Pack to be far more consistent. Even the 456-horsepower R/T model is solidly quick, with a claimed zero-to-60 mph time of 4.7 seconds and claimed quarter-mile time of 13.1 seconds. Like the Scat Pack, it sees a jump in output by pressing the Power Shot button, briefly adding 40 horsepower for a total of 496.
However, don’t confuse quick with fast. The Charger Daytona Scat Pack tops out at 134 mph, three miles per hour slower than the Charger Daytona R/T and, um, 41 mph slower than the old 6.4-liter V8-powered Scat Pack. You win some, you lose some. Granted, this isn’t the Charger Daytona’s final form, so a faster SRT variant isn’t out of the question.
Of course, just because the Charger Daytona is an EV doesn’t mean it’s silent. The Scat Pack trim comes with what Dodge calls a “Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust,” which contains a couple of passive radiators to let everyone around you know that you’re driving a muscle car. A passive radiator is essentially a speaker cone without the bits that make it go in and out using electrical signals, and passive radiators are frequently used to give Bluetooth speakers some extra kick. In this case, Dodge is using them to wake the dead. The only way the Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust could get more aggressive is if it played “Knuck if You Buck” out the back at 110 decibels.
Three Or Five Doors
One thing that’s strange about the new Dodge Charger Daytona, at least to me, is that it somehow looks less fresh than the model it replaces. There’s a certain recession-era feel to the heaviness of the surfacing, and it’s not just because we haven’t seen many new cars with enough styling for ten in the past few years. Maybe the wheels just don’t make a huge impact, maybe the trailing edge of the door is too far forward, maybe the daytime running light just doesn’t look great split across three elements. Maybe the vents in the rear bumper are poorly resolved, creating an unnecessary ridge where they meet the bodysides, and while the giant slab of dark plastic used as a valence evens out the slope of the hood when viewed in profile, the reflections it catches make you wish the new Charger was a whole lot lower than it is. Then again, maybe some of it is the trickster qualities of silver, or the focal length of the lens used to shoot these photos. I will have to reserve full judgement until I see it in person.
Fortunately, there is a way to make the Charger look a little more interesting. If rear seat access is a priority for you, a Charger with two doors on each side goes into production early next year, and given what we know about trunk access, that means America’s about to gain a full-sized five-door liftback.
Maybe it’s the revised greenhouse slimming out the C-pillar, maybe it’s the fact that the doors are now located properly, but there’s something nice about the five-door model, and it’s not just the wider virtual camera angle used in the CGI renderings manipulating the model to look longer. To me, there’s an incremental improvement here, but it’s not night-and-day.
While we don’t have full specifications for all variants of the new Charger Daytona, we do have dimensions of the three-door model, and they’re audacious. Measuring 206.6 inches stem-to-stern in R/T trim and 79.8 inches wide, the new Charger is an enormous machine that’s even larger than its predecessor, a full-size sedan. For the record, that’s only 1.6 inches shorter than a brand new Mercedes-Benz S-Class, and half an inch longer than a Lexus LS. Oh, and then there’s the width, which makes the Charger Daytona just one tenth of an inch narrower than a Ford F-150 and 1.1 inches wider than a Lamborghini Countach LP5000S QV. We’re talking outrageous dimensions here. In person, this car should have capital-P Presence.
More Damper, More Rubber, More Management Of More Curb Weight
So, big car, excellent power, quick acceleration times. What else are we working with here? Well, Dodge seems to have done some work with the intention of making the new Charger handle, and some of that work seems to incorporate the ‘Murica F-yeah more-is-better philosophy to a tee. Old habits die hard, right?
Tick the box for the Track Pack on the Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack (so the full name will be: “Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack With Track Package”), and you’ll get dual-valve adaptive dampers, 410 mm brake discs with fixed calipers on all four corners, and sticky track day-oriented Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar 3 tires measuring 305/35ZR20 up front and 325/35ZR20 out back. Why might it need such enormous tires? Well, a curb weight of 5,838 pounds in electric Charger Daytona Scat Pack trim might have something to do with it.
Speaking of handling-related stuff, the rear drive unit in every Charger Daytona features a proper limited-slip differential for enhanced traction and shenanigans, some of which fall under what Dodge calls Race Options. The Charger Daytona will include a special Donut Mode, which the brand says “Enables the vehicle to spin only the rear wheels and to rotate around either of the front wheels without intervention from the traction control system.”
There’s also a drift mode built into the Race Options on the Charger Daytona, and it seems a bit like what McLaren’s doing with Variable Drift Control. According to Dodge:
The driver can select three levels of slip angle, and torque is rear-axle biased, using the front axle to help maintain slip angle. Front dampers become full soft and rear dampers go full stiff to enable an oversteer condition, and the traction control system allows for different wheel speed differentials without setting fault codes.
There are a few things to unpack here, so let’s do that now. Firstly, it sounds like drift mode might not let drivers turn the front motor off completely and go rear-wheel-drive. Granted, 335 horsepower in a 5,838-pound car would work out to 17.4 pounds per horsepower, but you don’t need big power to throw down. Just ask drift-king Keiichi Tsuchiya. Maybe Dodge can push a software update should owners desire, but either way, color us intrigued. Secondly, stiffer rear dampers and softer front dampers should decrease mechanical grip in the rear and increase it in the front, making it easier to initiate a drift. That’s proper race car science and a great unorthodox use of adaptive dampers.
Add in line lock for smoky burnouts, launch control, and special Race Prep battery pre-conditioning, and the Dodge Charger Daytona has a whole lot of toys in its arsenal. As with any functions that may draw attention from local law enforcement, use them responsibly.
The Inside Story
If the outside of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona is throwing it back to 1968, the cabin is right on time. From the complex, flowing door cards to the proliferation of interactive technology, there’s no mistaking this cockpit for anything but a product of the 2020s. Up to 16 inches of digital instrument cluster behind a squircle steering wheel should offer plenty of information, while a 12.3-inch infotainment touchscreen on a driver-centric tilt feels like it’s here to remind BMW what it should be doing. It’s nice to see Dodge maintaining physical volume and tuning knobs, although not everything in the cabin is physical. The controls for the heated seats? Capacitive touch. The method of killing traction control? An actual button within easy reach of the shifter. Yep, Dodge knows its target market.
Speaking of fan service, it’s hard to not feel something looking at Dodge’s electronic reinterpretation of the classic pistol-grip shifter. Sure, a shifter in a typical electric vehicle doesn’t have a manumatic function, but does art need an excuse for existing? The heart wants what the heart wants.
Speaking of interior parts to get your pulse racing, check out those high-back seats with harness pass-throughs that look properly special. On the outgoing Charger, you effectively got wingback chairs in performance trims, and while those were plush and well-bolstered, they sure robbed a lot of interior room. These new front seats, in contrast, look to be a better blend of function and form.
Dodge is even offering the new Charger Daytona an integrated 1080p dashcam, an interesting piece of data acquisition gear more focused on track days than capturing incriminating footage of substandard motorists. Admittedly, I don’t expect many people to go hot lapping in a car that’s 206.6 inches long and weighs nearly three tons, but for those who will, we salute you. There’s a higher chance of people dropping the rear seats, opening the hatch, and using 103 cubic feet of cargo space as they see fit, and we salute those people too.
Early Perks
Remember way back in the propulsion system section of this article when we mentioned that the 2024 Charger Daytona Scat Pack will offer 630 horsepower, and the R/T will offer 456 horsepower? That’s only for the 2024 model year because Dodge is throwing in Direct Connection tunes for free, a Stage 1 on the R/T and a Stage 2 on the Scat Pack. Come the 2025 model year, unlocking horsepower will become a pay-to-play game, with your local Dodge parts counter handling the reflash. From Dodge:
The 400V propulsion system packs six performance levels into one powertrain. The 2024 Charger Daytona R/T arrives with a standard Direct Connection Stage 1 upgrade kit that adds 40 horsepower to reach a total of 496 horsepower, while the Daytona Scat Pack is delivered with a Stage 2 kit that offers an increase of additional 80 horsepower, taking total output to 670 horsepower. Future Daytona models will require purchase of Direct Connection Stage kits to upgrade from base models to Stage 1 and Stage 2 performance.
It turns out early adoption has some benefits. Mind you, Dodge makes Direct Connection upgrades sound more complicated than they are. Each trim gets its own Stage 1 and Stage 2 packages, which really gives each owner two choices besides staying stock.
Will It Work?
I’d seem like a sellout if I didn’t address the Hellephant in the room — the Dodge Charger Daytona EV is fighting an uphill battle. Just last year, Dodge had an entire lineup of endearing chest-thumping testosterone-laden burnout machines with a combined IQ of about seven. A Hellcat isn’t clever, which is exactly why it’s loved. Big dirty supercharged V8 up front, fully-lit Pirellis out back, “Free Bird” turned up to eleven in the middle — job done. It’s visceral, it’s provocative, it’s a twelve-year-old’s idea of how to make a fast car, and it rules. It wasn’t just Greta Van Fleet to the 1968 Charger’s Led Zeppelin, it was also Lil Durk, Germ, Young Thug, and Sexxy Red — a loud, braggadocious soundtrack for a new generation.
The new electric Dodge Charger Daytona has two potential paths — either win over diehards, or forge a new path. The old Charger eventually did both, but the political polarization of EVs has many muscle car devotees on the other side of the fence. At the same time, a litany of manufacturers are doing seriously interesting stuff with electric vehicles, to the point where a Kia EV6 GT put through Car And Driver testing posted performance numbers on-par with the Charger Daytona Scat Pack. When everything is savagely fast in a straight line and a litany of electric vehicles offer similar power curves, why go for a muscle car over a Nürburgring-tuned crossover, or a compact sports sedan, or something that looks almost French?
I like the concept of the Dodge Charger Daytona EV. We’re overdue for another three-door liftback, and the thought of a big, comfy, fast family car that isn’t a crossover makes me smile. Whether or not it’s a muscle car is a judgement we’ll have to reserve for when we drive it. If it sparks a fire in the hearts of those who drive it, I have a feeling it could steal some sales from rather unexpected places. Whatever happens, the story really gets going in a few months, as the Charger Daytona EV will enter production mid-year.
(Photo credits: Dodge)
Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.
-
The New Dodge Charger Is A Coupe Again As God Intended
-
This Is Allegedly The Next Dodge Muscle Car Before You’re Supposed To See It
-
The Gorgeous New Electric Dodge Charger Daytona SRT Concept Comes With An ‘Exhaust’ System And A Transmission
-
The Dodge Charger Daytona SRT EV Concept Looks Surprisingly Production-Like
-
Badass For 18 Straight Years: How Chrysler Worked Hard To Keep The Dodge Charger And Its LX-Platform Mates From Going Stale
Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.
If a passenger cannot enter ≠ door.
I will die on this hill.
I had a Honda Civic that would freeze up so badly that I often had to enter through the trunk to start it and let it warm up enough to open the doors.
You could crawl through the rear hatch. Its possible, not practical.
I can also enter my house through a window, but no one would call that a door
Replace the glass with a magnetic flap. now it’s a giant pet door.
I am honestly just confused by the hatch/trunk equaling a door, and when to apply it. Maybe if I understood the rules, it wouldn’t bother me as much. I can fold down the rear seats in my Ford Focus sedan, does that make it a 5 door, or does the trunk lid need to have a window for that to make it a 5 door? If the rear hatch or trunk has an integrated window, like on a Jeep XJ, or a Chevy Suburban, does that make those 5 door vehicles as well, or are those too vertical?
I am open to change, but I think the old way of thinking that doors are only on the sides of the vehicle make the most sense to me. I wouldn’t have considered the rear hatch on a station wagon with the wayback seats a proper door either, even though it could be used for passenger entry.
I will concede that there are a few vehicles I would consider to have 5 doors, such as the old Land Rover Defender and G-Wagen. Those doors open on side swing hinges and because depending on model and configuration were used for passanger loading with side wall seating (mostly limited to military and specialty applications).
What about some of the older station wagons? The have a top hinge lift gate (not side hinge), but fold up rear facing 3rd row so it is a passenger entrance.
This is as annoying as 4-door coupes. Words have meaning.
How about portal? Vehicular Access Opening? Ingress/Egress Transportable Material Passage?
To paraphrase Moe;
Car holes.
Did the Dukes of Hazzard use doors?
WHAT? A new platform? WOW!!!!!!!!
Is there a version that isn’t stupid fast? I love the look but don’t want to pay for speed I will never, ever, ever use.
I really like the way it looks, but…
FIVE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED AND THIRTY-EIGHT POUNDS?!?
Sweet fancy Moses…
How did they manage to make it so heavy? That’s like 1000 pounds more than Model S.
It’s like somebody bet them they couldn’t make it heavier.
Cheap metal.
1000 lbs more than my crew cab f150…
The 15-19 e-golf also has a shifter, and it can be a lot of fun to actually use when slowing and stopping. Pulling the shifter back puts you in motor braking mode/1 foot drive mode. Pushing forward dis-engages motor braking. There are also 3 separate re-gen modes that the shifter controls. Push to the left to increase- push right to decrease.
I know it’s not a manual experience, however it can almost be used as one to slow, or maintain traffic speed. Hopefully Dodge finds some fun in that shifter.
The Chevy Bolt has a similar design: “D” is the non-regen mode and if you pull the shifter back to toggle “L” then you get auto regen braking. The Bolt does not have multiple levels of regen like the eGolf, but I drove an eGolf for 3x years and barely even remember the multi-level regen mode today.
I live in a hilly area, so the Regen levels are great for shedding speed going downhill, like most large SUVs do. With the 4 different levels it can become a bit of game to not hit the brake pedal.
The Scat Pack trim comes with what Dodge calls a “Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust,” which contains a couple of passive radiators to let everyone around you know that you’re driving a muscle car.
That will dovetail nicely with the official Scat Pack underwear sock (sold separately).
Sadly that unfortunate name along with a customer base who can’t or won’t read the directions will result in a tragic but comedic placement of that sock.
The Personal Luxury Coupe is back!
Can’t wait until someone slaps some vinyl on the roof.
Bill Blass Edition coming up.
Nah, get that Ferd stuff away from this car.
Something something Rich Corinthian Leather something something.
Right, Mark Cross Edition then. My grandfather had one, K-Car New Yorker.
Looks good. Glad to see the OEMs are at least trying to have some fun with EV designs. The range is a bit low on this, but how far does one have to go for Cars and Coffee? Kidding aside, I welcome the entry of EV sports/muscle cars. Some nice variety and change up from the appliances.
Can we talk about the absurdity of the “Fratzonic” … Fratboy-fart-sonic artificial engine noise generator? The last thing we need is an arms race for making EV’s as noisy as possible.
At least it has a “stealth” option to turn it off. You’ll know who the real D bags are that way 😉
Also, passive radiators don’t generate sound. I suppose you could tune them to resonate a certain way with a tuned enclosure, but AFAIK they’re not used without an active conventional speaker somewhere in the same air chamber.
Correct, a passive radiator must be volume-coupled to an active transducer in order to function. A passive radiator by itself would just sit there doing nothing.
Yeah launch this shit into the fucking sun.
Too late. Shots fired.
They will sell several dozen, I think.
This is a really neat interpretation of a muscle car, and seems to be a bit of a return the the classic American big sedans. However, this thing needs more battery. 260 from a 93kwh pack is abysmal.
That really depends on how they rated it. Tesla overstates and some companies understate it. Ford does better on range in the Mach E, this may be on the conservative side. Considering I averaged 14 MPG from my ICE Scat Pack Charger its par for the course.
I expect it not to be hugely different just based on how massive of a car this is, but I hope i’m wrong.
This is fine. EVs are kind of a commodity. You buy based on styling as most all performance is equalish. My question is, will anyone ever make a convertible EV. I know the weight penalty makes it hard, but my wife just wants something to cruise around town with the top down.
The closest we get right now is the Jeep 4xe in electric mode.
I like wives who cruise around with their tops down; sadly, mine refuses.
Given the weight of this thing, I doubt anyone would notice a couple hundred more for the convertible bits.
Oh, Christ: even more bullseyes in intersections come January 2025! I’m not the target demographic, and, at 5800lbs, I’d steer away anyway. That said, I do applaud the hatchback sedan—and hope it prompts more of the same. I’ll give them credit for trying. So, …what’s the EV equivalent of “Hell yeah, brother!” ?
Three tons!? This is going to obliterate pedestrians. I do admire the three-door’s aesthetics. I might wish for a detuned version that trades some of the go-fast for go-far.
I’d imagine the gas version will be substantially lighter, and on paper it seems like the one to get. The straight 6 is significantly lighter than any of the old V8s and it won’t be lugging any batteries around.
Good point. I would hope for a sub 4,000 lb result. Being ignorant and all, I am constantly in awe of the weight of batteries. Looking forward to the next big breakthrough in battery tech.
Reserving comment on how this thing looks until seen in person.
Not a fan of the drl design, or the front grill/fascia, but may look better in person.
I doubt it’ll be under 4,000 since the old Charger wasn’t, but it’s a new platform with a much lighter engine, so who knows!
The RT was 4291 so its possible.
1000 lbs heavier than a Model S Plaid that is quicker and offers more theoretical range.
But it’s much less expensive than the Plaid, and doesn’t have the baggage of a nazi-enabling owner.
The price wasn’t in the article when I read it, but if the only selling feature is 0-60, then it has to compete.
Yes, the price wasn’t in the article, but there’s no way it will be anywhere near the price of a Plaid.
Never even occurred to me that 0-60 would be the only selling feature.
Why would you think that?
Maybe it being a big, comfortable, (I’m completely confident more comfortable than any Tesla), EV, that’s not just another SUV, will be a selling feature.
It looks good. I don’t know if I’d buy one new, but I’ll keep an eye on it.
Meanwhile, I’ll sit back while everyone else brews up a pitcher of Haterade.
Just seems like they’re chasing something in their past instead of making the best car possible – doesn’t seem competitive with the current EV landscape, let alone what’s coming from China.
They might sell a few to those that are interested in the tradition and open to EVs, but I’ll be shocked if this thing doesn’t bomb.
For such a long article and car, I wish I could find any reason to care for this. Stelantis is dead on the water
If they wanted to get this EV-hater interested, they need to offer a lot more than 317 miles of range. Jesus. 260 is utterly unacceptable in 2024.
I’m curious about the performance range. If you took this to the strip, how many runs would you realistically get and still have enough juice to drive home?
A Tesla Plaid uses about 2% of its battery per 1/4 mile run. This battery is a bit smaller, but I bet you could still get 30-40 runs in before recharging.
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-s-plaid-dead-battery-quarter-mile-time/
With 400v architecture you will see battery sag and the car will slow down on the passes.
Man, that is disappointing and a pretty huge drop if you want the Scat Pack. Personally, I’d be OK with 300+ miles, but I’d like the more powerful powertrain to go along with it.
It’s funny how the article (and Dodge’s own statements) imply that this is a different kind of EV and meant to appeal to people who don’t like current EVs, but it’s a straight-line one trick pony with short range like every other EV ever sold.
You want to change the game, Dodge? Offer a 1000 mile EV. I’ve bought an expensive car from you before, and I’d buy that one too.
What sedan or coupe can go 1000 miles on a tank of gas? Hint, its none of them.
What EV can add 300-400 miles of range in 5 minutes at every freeway exit in the nation? Hint, it’s none of them.
Man that five-door does not do anything for me, it looks like an early unfinished iteration of the 2006 model.
Hopefully it’ll look better in person, and that’s just an unflattering angle
Agreed. I love long American cars, including the last generation Charger, and this 5-door just looks terrible to me.
Agreed. It gives me the same impression as the four door Corvair variants give me.
The yellow color and side profile give me vibes that this is the 21st century replacement for the NYC crown Vic taxi cabs.
Still has electric door handles, which is one of the things I hate about most electric cars.
Good news for Windsor (along with the forthcoming Stellantis battery plant in that city that the government paid through the nose to secure). I never found the Old Charger particularly interesting because it was weirdly small inside for such a big car, but I’m glad to see that EVs are now showing they can be outlandish and weird, not just aero teardrops. (No disrespect to the Ioniq 6, that thing’s sexy.)
I don’t really have any interest in the EV variants of these but they sure do look great, and a FIVE DOOR!?!? Glorious.
Wonder what these will start at, or be in year 2 or 3. Considering the sharp rise of cost for the lightning, and the mavericks rise and change from standard to optional.
Any ideas on pricing? (Before, of course, the outlandish dealer markups they’ll try to extract).
These are going to be crazy expensive
At first. But when nobody buys them, the price will come down.
$60k starting price. Thats my bet. *seats and tires are options…..