I have a lot of respect for Honda as a carmaker, but when it comes to the HR-V, I have to be honest with you here: it’s one of those cars that manages, somehow, to make me like it less and less with each generation, and I have to give Honda credit for keeping that slope plummeting downward, at least for me. The first generation HR-V is a car I genuinely love: clever, unsual-looking, fun. The next two generations (well, we only got one other one in the U.S.) were just, well, boring, and now we have the new one, and it just looks like it’s absolutely disgusted with me and all the stupid things I stand for.
In case you would like a little visual refresher on the evolution of the hilariously-named Hi-Rider Revolutionary Vehicle, which is what Honda tells us HR-V stands for, I have you covered:
Look how incredible that first-generation one is! It came in both two- and four-door versions, and was a wedgy little FWD or 4WD small SUV based on the Honda Logo hatchback. It had a really distinctive look with that taught, angular body and the high-riding stance. It’s fantastic, and while we never got it here in the States, it always catch my eye when I see it in other countries.
The next HR-V was based on the excellent Honda Fit platform, but turned into the sort of anonymous crossover you could lose in a Target parking lot with only two other cars in it. Aside from a nice character line swooping up the side to that C-pillar-mounted rear door handle, it feels as generic as its big brother, the equally forgettable CR-V.
I mean, don’t get me wrong; both the CR-V and HR-V are fine and do their basic jobs well enough, but I think it would take a rigorous drug regimen and perhaps an elective surgery to make me able to actually give a shit about either car.
Europe and Asia got a new HR-V last year, still Fit-based, and still pretty forgettable, if maybe a bit more upscale-looking. Whatever you think of it, Honda decided it just wasn’t right for us Americans, so we’re getting this entirely different HR-V, based on the Civic platform, and with a whole new look:
Honda hasn’t revealed any technical details yet about the new HR-V, though it’s likely that drivetrains will carry over from the Civic — maybe the 158 horsepower 2-liter four, or the turbo 1.5 liter four that makes 180 hp, possibly bolted to a CVT.
Honda only revealed that there would be “improved dynamics” and that there’s a new independent rear suspension, so not too much to go on. I’m sure it’ll drive just fine for what most buyers will demand of it.
We don’t know much about what’s underneath, so we may as well talk about the look, which means we have to talk about that face. Up top I put the visage it reminds me of most–one of those gray aliens, looking especially nonplussed with humanity.
Something about this face just looks disgusted. I get that aggression is a concept that American buyers especially respond to, but this feels more, I don’t know, judgmental than, say, determined.
It’s not happy with me. At all.
I do like the bold, elongated hexagon grille pattern, though, and the long, sharply-creased hood is handsome and hides the wipers away like a ’70s American car, so that’s not bad.
The side profile is clean and has a nice, recessed tuck in after the front wheelarch which helps reduce the visual bulk, but it’s really pretty forgettable next to most modern crossovers. I do like that it comes in at least one real color, though.
In silver, from the side, I think most people would walk right by it without realizing it’s anything new. Again, not bad, and very likely the right choice for the given market, but knowing the striking way the HR-V started life, it’s sort of disappointing.
The rear is a similar story: basically fine, basically forgettable, could be any number of other current crossovers.
I suppose it’s possible you’re noticing that the roof looks somewhat cleaner than most crossovers and SUVs? No longitudinal seams where the roof panel meets the side rails? Honda is proud of that and tells us so:
“For a cleaner, upscale look, laser-brazing technology eliminates the need for unsightly roof moldings…”
I’m not sure I ever found roof moldings “unsightly,” but if that’s something that’s always bothered you, boy are you in luck.
So, if you’ve always wanted a crossover that’s forgettable from the sides and back but from the front looks like it just watched you eat a booger with glee, then I bet you’re going to love the new HR-V.
My first Honda was an ’81 Accord Hatchback so I have been a fan for decades. To me Honda has an undeniable design cycle, they go from interesting/cool/clever to just plain bland, and the cycle just continues, cool to bland, cool to bland, cool to bland…
So for me, this generation of HR-V has firmly landed on the bland, but I guess that’s OK, I’m sure they will sell plenty of them. I just hope the new version has a bit more power because the 2020 version I drove for 2 weeks was almost scary it was so slow to get up to 65mph.
I laughed hard at the pic, this place is like a comfy set of worn in shoes yet shinier.
Why have we yet to agree that these cars need to be called HaRVey? Now it even looks like an alien named Harvey. And there their is the sister car…CuRVey.
It looks like someone tried to draw the current Escape from memory and came up with this…
Another day, another boring crossover with a design that could be confused with another. I can already imagine them in droves of white, grey, tan, or black everywhere. To me, the front looks like the newer Escape and the rear looks like a slightly updated second-gen Santa Fe.
Honestly, looks more like the US and International versions are just annoys that they’re no so bland looking.
Torch, you make the assumption that this alien has disdain for gleeful booger-eating. I’m not sure that’s the case. In fact, the opposite might be true. I suspect it may find delight in the eating of rolled mucus; however, it would certainly scoff at carbureted VW Things and neurotic taillight designs. No?
Wait, isn’t the CR-V based on the Civic? What would be the difference between them now, other than parsing out market share? Real question to which I do not know the answer!
I would say it’s only mildly annoyed. Especially compared to most of the current cars available.
But wonder when we can get back to happy looking vehicles? Perhaps it would even bleed to drivers? I’ve noticed that pissed off looking cars cause more aggression. The way other road users were towards my ex-Alfa 159 vs Mini Countryman was like night and day. And my driving style is in no way aggressive (large safety margins, driving constant speed and with the flow of the traffic, etc).
The new ROW version is actually quite a sharp-looking little thing. This USDM one looks like ass. However, Honda becomes more irrelevant as a car maker with every new reveal.
It is like a late 00’s Santa Fe mated with a Subaru B9 Tribeca.
That being said, I don’t hate it.
Are you sure the HR-V is a Honda? I thought that was a Toyota. *checks Toyota.com* I’m disappointed in you, Autopian. According to Toyota it’s not even called the HR-V! It’s called the C-HR! Please try to get it right next time.
I’m sooo tired of looking at all the *angry faced* vehicle’s running around. What happened to class?
Still better looking than a BMW, take what you can get these days