The Tesla Cybertruck Logo Is A Drippy, Graffiti Mess That Makes No Sense

Ct Logowhy Top
ADVERTISEMENT

It’s kind of amazing to realize that we’ve all been collectively talking about the Tesla Cybertruck for over four years now, and it’s still not in regular production yet. It’s impressive that the sharp-angled truck-like thing still manages to get people’s attention, so it’s a success in that regard if nothing else. It’s been in the news lately because in Tesla’s very recent investor call, Tesla’s rarely-seen or heard CEO Elon Musk admitted that getting the Cybetruck into production is extraordinarily difficult and will take about a year and a half before any money gets made. A few may trickle out in late 2024, but real production likely won’t happen until 2025. Anyway, everyone’s talking about Cybertrucks at the moment, which made me look at more pictures of them, which in turn presented the Cybertruck logo in front of my eyes as well. And that’s what I want to talk about today. Specifically, why does it suck so much?

Also, I can’t help but take a moment to note something Musk said in the investor’s call:

 “That is why there have not been new car start-ups that have been successful for 100 years apart from Tesla.”

This is, of course, a ridiculous thing to say, and I think it’s probably best to show how silly and ill-informed this statement is by just listing a few successful car brands that have formed within the past century, in no particular order: Honda, SEAT, Tata, Volvo, Plymouth, Ferrari, Datsun/Nissan, Volkswagen, Toyota (they made looms before, but no cars until 1934), Kia, Hyundai, and then there’s a ton of Chinese brands and smaller niche but successful companies, and so much more. Maybe he meant in America, in which case that is closer to the truth, though Chrysler wasn’t founded until 1925 and if we say AMC was successful – and I’d say they were, for a while – they weren’t actually established under that name until 1954, and Jeep started in 1941, and, of course that’s not counting recent companies like Rivian or Lucid which, to be fair, I think it’s too early to say they’re “successful.”

Other than that, though, sure, he’s right. Sorry for the tangent, but it’d be asking a lot to just ignore that.

Okay, back to the logo. Let’s take a look at the Cybertruck logo here:

Ct Logo1

Let’s just describe what we’re looking at here. I think the most notable thing that first strikes you about this logo has to be how impressively illegible it is. Out of context, not knowing it says “Cybertruck,” how long do you think it would take you to figure out just what the hell it does say? It’s not easy, but if I drink enough washer fluid so I can temporarily forget what this says, maybe I’d see this and read it as “CAERRTVKK?” That’s kind of how it looks.

Now, I get that this is supposed to be a sort of graffiti-inspired logo design, and legibility isn’t exactly a hallmark of the genre, but when it comes to logotypes for a given product, I think it’s generally a plus to know what the logo actually says.

We’ll address the graffiti inspiration itself in a moment, but you’d think if you were going to draw from the vast and rich visual world of graffiti design, you’d pick something that didn’t look like a tag on the back of a Wendy’s dumpster done by a rushed suburban 15-year-old in the dark, while desperately nervous. Is it cool? It doesn’t feel cool. It feels like it’s trying to be cool, in a really ham-fisted way, or cool in the way that your aunt pictures cool, the “urban decay” equivalent of a dog in shades playing a saxophone on a skateboard.

It’s not like a graffiti-inspired logo is breaking any new ground, either, especially for trucks. It seems like in the 1990s almost every carmaker had at least one graffito-inspired badge or decal for some trim level of an SUV or truck.

Othergraffito

I’m not saying any of these were particularly great, but they generally were legible, at least.

Then there’s the whole question of why. Why did Tesla pick this design aesthetic to go with the Cybertruck, which doesn’t feel like that at all, being all straight lines and sharp angles and polygonal precision? What about the name “Cybertruck” suggests the rough, rapid, messy look of spray-painted graffiti? I mean, look at these two objects together:

Ct Truck

That ugly mass of messy black lines really doesn’t mesh with that ugly mass of precise steel polygons, does it? I mean, I understand an urge for contrast of some kind, but I don’t think that’s what was being gone for here, because it looks like there has been some half-assed attempt to capture the design vocabulary of the truck by limiting the graffiti logo to angled lines and no curves.

In fact, the first Cybertruck logo that was registered in 2019, before the Cybertruck was revealed, was dramatically different. It looked like this:

Ct 2019 Logo

This does seem to fit the aesthetic of the truck better, I think. It’s not an amazing logo, but it’s not bad, and, interestingly, it looks like the original spelling may have been a much more phone-app-style vowel-less thing: CYBRTRK. I’d probably have complained about that, too.

Is there a way to take the graffiti Cybertruck logo and maybe make it feel more in tune with the Cybertruck’s actual look? I guess you could start with the basic shapes in the graffiti logo, but make them into Cybertruck-style wedge shapes:

Ct Logo Alt

That’s more legible, and I think sorta fits the look of the truck better, but it also looks more Cuneiform than anything, really, and I’m not sure ancient Sumerian is the image a tech-focused automaker wants to invoke [Ed note: Well… “Snow Crash,” a cyberpunk book I’m sure Elon Musk loves, actually features a decent amount of Sumerian Cuneiform references in it. – MH]

Cp2077

I do have one theory about why this type logo was picked; I think it’s possible that Elon was influenced by the Cyberpunk 2077 video game. This game was announced, with its logo, long before the Cybertruck was announced, and Elon is definitely aware of the game, as he demonstrated it being played in a Tesla:

Could this be the genesis of it all? That sort of scrawled text in the Cyberpunk 2077 logo is sort of similar, though it really feels more like a ’90s design callback than straightforward, drippy, spray-paint-on-drywall graffiti like the Cybertruck logo. But beyond that, I’m still pretty baffled by why anyone thought those angular, drippy scribbles would be a good logo.

Of course, I’m curious to hear what you think in the comments, but from where I sit, this logo is hard to read, confusing in tone, feels cynical and, worst of all, is just kind of ugly. It feels like all of two hours of thought was put into this, at most. Even if it’s too late to redesign the truck before launch, it’s not too late to take another crack at the logo. Logos are important! Tesla is a huge, rich company. There’s no reason to have such a shit logo.

Well, now that I think about it, maybe it does kinda make sense?

Relatedbar

Bugatti Updates Its Logo In The Most Boring Way Possible

The New Kia Logo Is Confusing Thousands Of People And We’re Issuing A Technical Service Bulletin To Fix It

Here Are All (Well, Most Of) The American Cars With Illuminated Badges, Which Should Have Been More Of A Thing

116 thoughts on “The Tesla Cybertruck Logo Is A Drippy, Graffiti Mess That Makes No Sense

    1. For real. The Cybertruck is try-hard cringe in automotive form. Although, to be fair, at the age of 41 i may be woefully unqualified to render such judgments.

  1. I know I’m in the minority here, but this logo is the only part of the Cybertruck that I like.

    To be fair, it has nothing to do with the Tesla truck, it just reminds me of the logo I made for my grind-core band in highschool.

  2. It’s like combining the launch of the Aztek with those horrible protest signs with the branded materials for Piraka Advertising in the 2006 Bionicle set year.

  3. The answer is that Elon has developed some type of addiction that is inching him off his rocker. I now call this vehicle the Tesla KET (Ketamine Ego Trip) because that’s what this whole project is, drug fueled megalomania.

    I bet you could make some amazing logos out of KET.

    1. Not gonna lie, I’ve not seen this before but if I’m interpreting it correctly, it’s 1000% on point lol. Though if we’re talking Elon, I think you used about 3 too many = signs …

  4. Itchy:
    Look, Scratchy, it’s our new friend, Poochie!
    Scratchy:
    What’s that name again? I forgot.
    Poochie:
    The name’s Poochie D
    And I rock the telly.
    I’m half-Joe Camel
    And a third Fonzarelli.
    I’m the kung fu hippie
    From Gangsta City.
    I’m a rappin’ surfer,
    You’re the fool I pity.
    Scratchy:
    Ooh, Poochie is one outrageous dude.
    Itchy:
    He’s totally in my face.

  5. I’m not going to car shame because that is not the Autopian Way. We are all entitled to our feelings and opinions, especially when it comes to cars.

    My feeling, my opinion, is that nothing about this car, from the design to the logo, appeals to me.

    1. The answer is actually use Papyrus.

      B/c Musk and James Cameron have a fair amount of similarities, a big one being their defensive, “how dare you NOT recognize the grandeur of what I’m doing!?” attitude.

      1. Cameron seems to stick to what he knows, thank God. Movies and underwater exploration. Musk has done well with rockets and electric cars but reinventing a social media platform and moving from electric cars to electric trucks have both proved challenging. Seemingly purposely sabotaging those projects, by design, hasn’t helped.

  6. It’s a stone-cold “inspired by” ripoff of the original R. Talsorian Games “Cyberpunk 2020” role playing game logo. I’ve still got the book on my shelf.

    1) someone in Elon’s orbit is a huge nerd
    2) this kind of dipshit ripoff of a 1980s William Gibson sprawl trilogy based RPG is precisely what I would expect of a guy who designs a truck to look like the original x-wing arcade game.

  7. Remember when Mega Man came out and the box art looked nothing like the game character because marketing was told what the game was and then threw something together?

    This looks like one of those scenarios, even though it probably isn’t.

  8. To me the logo always looked like one of those “Hi, my name is” name tags filled out by someone that doesn’t know how to read or write, but only knows how to write their own name.

  9. The man literally named his vehicle line-up S3XY, and we’re surprised, or flummoxed, by the fact that his SS origami truck has an illegible type font?

    Just remember that Elon has the emotional maturity of an 11-year old and everything will make sense from here on out.

  10. Graffiti inspired? This looks much closer to one of those “I am not a robot” puzzles that proliferate on-line. And no, I’d never be able to type this correctly.

  11. I always imagined it should look sorta like the ’90s Ford Escort logo, maybe 10% blockier. Would fit the Blade Runner aesthetic of the truck’s lines.

  12. I definitely think it’s the influence of CyberPunk, but from the first book as it would fit that vibe.

    Personally, it think the logo fits this dumpster fire of a pickup.

  13. It looks like the sort of experiments with writing (I think) a lot of us did in elementary and middle school. Stack letters, try messier and cleaner lines, etc. I wouldn’t do it as a logo for something you want people to recognize. This is worse than the new Kia logo.

Leave a Reply