Time, as we all likely know by now, is kind of a jerk. It’s cold and unfeeling and trudges on forward inexorably and doesn’t give a brace of BMs what you think about that. It ages us and pushes our memories further and further away, changing the way we see things. That’s why sometimes we need to take a moment and remind ourselves to consider some things not just in the context of our eternally-fleeting present, but in the overall period of time where it existed. I think Volkswagen’s New Beetle is a great example of this; today it’s often dismissed as some silly, less-practical Golf, or, worse and more troubling, with the misogynistic moniker of a “chick car,” but the truth is when the New Beetle hit the scene in the late 1990s, it was a huge deal. I know, because I was there, and I was excited as all hell. Plus, it brought back an element to the automotive world that had been in painfully short supply: fun.
I remember the period when the New Beetle was being developed and teased and tested and eventually released extremely well. I was, in some ways, an ideal target for the car: a longtime air-cooled VW Beetle fan, someone who daily drove a 1973 Beetle, in my 20s, working in a creative industry and caring about the design of things. Well, I guess if I actually had money to spend on a car, that would have helped, but that’s just a detail! A silly detail.
As a kid, I grew up in the back (often the very back, in the luggage well) of my dad’s ’68 Beetle. I remember seeing one of the very last Beetle convertibles in a VW showroom in 1980. From there, I remember the transformation of VW from the company that made peculiar and friendly rear-engined, air-cooled cars that were curvy and distinctive into a company that made highly rectilinear FWD, liquid-cooled machines that, while often very competent and interesting in their own way, nevertheless did not have the same character as the old rear-engined cars. In some ways, I felt like Volkswagen had given into the pressures of the mainstream automotive landscape, and there was nothing left for me there.
Then, in 1994, the Volkswagen Concept One was shown at the Detroit Auto Show and everything felt like it changed. It’s hard to explain to people who didn’t live through it, but the 1990s were a strangely optimistic time. There was a feeling that permeated everything that made you feel like things were changing, but in a good way. It felt like we were finally figuring things out. The internet was just becoming part of life, and it was still early enough that you could believe all of the utopian-sounding hype about it. For a while, everything felt like it was it changing and getting better, and the reveal of this re-born Beetle fit the narrative perfectly.
It was a day I never really thought would come; I knew Volkswagen of Mexico was still building original-style air-cooled Beetles, but getting those into America was an unlikely and difficult pipe dream. The idea that VW finally seemed to be paying attention to all of us old Beetle-obsessed fools just felt incredible.
(I like this early sketch because it seems to have the turn indicators on the tops of the fenders, like the original Beetle)
And, even better, it looked to be a truly modernized Beetle, still capturing that Beetle essence, but updated for the end of the 20th century. This, of course, was due to the incredible design work of Freeman Thomas and J Mays, who undertook the project without the initial approval of Volkswagen in Germany, who, culturally, saw the Beetle in a very different context than Americans did. For the Germans, the Beetle was a reminder of hard and lean times after the war, and while there was certainly affection for the Käfer that helped to start the whole German economic postwar miracle, there was a lot less nostalgia for the old Bug than in America.
When re-imagining the 1938 Volkswagen Type 1 (the official name of the Beetle) design into a modern design vocabulary, Thomas and Mays distilled the Beetle down to its absolute most basic visual essence: three curves.
The basic three curves became the New Beetle’s logo, and you can easily see how this concept was expressed in the form of the concept car, known as Concept One:
The Concept One was based on the VW Polo platform, which wasn’t available in America and was a bit smaller than the Golf. It was a front-engine/FWD/liquid-cooled platform, completely the opposite of the original Beetle, and while I was disappointed by this, I also remember just kind of accepting this as the Way Things Had To Be. And, while in my mind that made these re-born Beetles not true Beetles, I was still so excited by the general concept and look that I accepted it as the price of existing in modernity.
I remember seeing this picture below in magazines, a VW-released collage of the design process, with old Beetles around for inspiration and some interesting hints at ideas that didn’t make it, like the rear deck vents on the turquoise model in the lower right.
The hype when the Concept One was shown was enormous; this was one of those times where a car was making news that went beyond the usual greasy-fingered gearhead circles, and had everyone talking. This is partially a testament to the incredible success of the original Beetle; even in the early 1990s, when the car hadn’t been officially sold in America for over a decade, almost everyone still had some sort of Beetle story, whether they owned one themselves or some kooky friend had one and the went on that crazy roadtrip, or the things they did in one or whatever. So many people had an emotional connection to the Beetle, and this concept reminded people of that.
After the first Concept One, VW showed a red convertible New Beetle at the New York auto show:
In 1995 came the Concept Two, shown at the Geneva Auto Show, and by this iteration the design was just about finalized to what it would look like as a production car:
Here’s a production one, from the first year of production:
As you can see, a few things were changed from Concept One: the car was now larger, on the Golf 4 platform, the front end lost the oval grilles that evoked the original, pre-’68 Beetle’s horn grilles and replaced those with a wide, under-bumper grille. The hood had been lengthened a bit, and some of the purity of the “three circles” idea had been lost, but not much, and the result both felt like the archaic old Beetle and something completely new.
Living in Los Angeles at the time, I remember seeing pre-production New Beetles being tested on Wilshire Blvd, surrounded by a coterie of black Jettas and with their badges missing or taped over– like anyone would think they were, say, a new Chevy or whatever. VW didn’t bother to really camouflage these, because what would be the point? Beetles just look like Beetles. All of this was in the everyone-has-a-camera-on-them-always era, so I regretfully never managed to get any pictures of those test Beetles. But I wish I did.
I can’t overstate the impact the New Beetle had on overall design at the time; it came onto the scene just as industrial design was starting to feel a bit more free, more open to having fun, and the New Beetle was like a massive, obvious banner reading YES LET’S DO IT to every company out there, no matter what they made. The bright colors, the pure and friendly curves, the exuberance and unashamed glee, these were all things inherent in the New Beetle and ready to pop all over industrial design. And that’s nor even mentioning the effect the New Beetle had on retro-inspired automotive design, which paved the way for the new Mini, new Fiat 500, the Mustang re-design, the Ford Thunderbird, and more.
One of the best examples of this is perhaps the most famous: the iMac. Look how this Newsweek article about Steve Jobs and the introduction of the iMac starts:
“Look at That!” says Steve Jobs he pulls his Mercedes into a parking space. He’s pointing at a new Volkswagen Beetle, and as soon as he parks, he dashes over, circling the shiny black Bug, taking the measure of a well-publicized update of once great product design. “They got it right,” he concludes.
I’m not saying the New Beetle inspired the iMac, but I am saying that both the New Beetle and the iMac were at the vanguard of a revolution in industrial design that was happening in the 1990s; it was as though the whole material world had suddenly rediscovered color and frivolity and translucency and for a while, everyone decided it was okay to have, say, a microwave that looked like a gumdrop or a de-humidifier that seemed like it came out of a CGI cartoon.
I found an old Automobile magazine from 1997, and you can feel the optimism in the coverage of the New Beetle. They’re excited. The New Beetle was nostalgic and hopeful and just about fun. There was so much hype about the way the instruments illuminated (a blue designed to look like how an illuminted swimming pool looks at night) and the bud vase, built into the dash. Yes, old Beetles in the ’50s and ’60s could have an optional flower vase, but these were never common. And yet VW decided to make it a standard part of the design! A standard flower vase, on a mass-market car. Just think about that.
My parents got a yellow turbo New Beetle (the one that made a very respectable for the time 150 hp) and got a custom license plate that read YOLKSWAGEN. This is the sort of thing the car inspired, even in parents like mine, a diminutive elderly couple who routinely has conversations at a decibel level that makes local airports call and complain and whose general idea of fun is buying things and then returning them, with complaints. They were inspired to get a fun, quick, bright yellow car with a punny license plate because this was the power of the New Beetle’s design.
Sure, late ’90s to early 2000s Volkswagen quality wasn’t great. I’ve been stung, badly, by VWs of this era, and New Beetles were no exception. But they had better interiors than almost any other car of their class at the time, they could be engaging to drive, reasonably practical, and, again, were simply fun. This was a car designed from the get-go to cause people to smile, and that alone makes it worthy of redemption in my book.
The look is definitely of an era when seen today, but the charm is still there, and I think these little colorful bubbles deserve our respect, because they did something simple and noble: they tried to make the world a little more fun.
You can still find these around, for usually pretty cheap, and I’m often tempted by a convertible new Beetle as a cheap, fun little ragtop. People who roll their eyes at New Beetles or treat them with the peculiar hostility of the insecure need to, I think, just lighten up. The New Beetle new what it was, and it was just that. Fun.
My good friends bought one of these, in yellow, with the 2.0 and an automatic. The engine had some kind of catastrophic failure around 60,000 miles and that was the end of the beetle. They weren’t “car people” but they took care of it to the extent of keeping up on maintenance. It was really disappointing because they loved that car and it definitely put them off VWs for life.
I was at the Detroit auto show in ’94. VW had a giant stamping machine on the show floor making stylized New Beetle plastic pressings. So cool. Wish I had gotten one. The line was huge.
I was at the Detroit auto show in ’94. VW had a giant stamping machine on the show floor making stylized New Beetle plastic pressings. So cool. Wish I had gotten one. The line was huge.
I’m not here for this rehabilitation. A 2001 TDI was bar none the worst vehicle I’ve ever owned, turned me away from both VW and diesel forever (with the help of a godawful Ford 7.3), and nothing under the sun can make me go back to either.
I’m not here for this rehabilitation. A 2001 TDI was bar none the worst vehicle I’ve ever owned, turned me away from both VW and diesel forever (with the help of a godawful Ford 7.3), and nothing under the sun can make me go back to either.
Now I’m wondering how hard it would be to cram a Subaru boxer engine under that rear deck….
Now I’m wondering how hard it would be to cram a Subaru boxer engine under that rear deck….
These sucked like any other VW at the time. Based on the shitty Mk4 Golf/Jetta but with even less utility LOL
These sucked like any other VW at the time. Based on the shitty Mk4 Golf/Jetta but with even less utility LOL
I disagree with the premise here. VW basically reimagined the 60+ year Beetle as a weird flower-holding lump of retro-infantilization. As a big fan of the original car and a huge convertible fan, I think it’s a big fail. They did the same thing recently with the ID. Buz, again it’s a pointless exercise aimed clearly at a single misunderstood demographic.
I disagree with the premise here. VW basically reimagined the 60+ year Beetle as a weird flower-holding lump of retro-infantilization. As a big fan of the original car and a huge convertible fan, I think it’s a big fail. They did the same thing recently with the ID. Buz, again it’s a pointless exercise aimed clearly at a single misunderstood demographic.
Not my thing, but I was happy when they came out as retro wasn’t (yet) a source of cringe (Thunderbird), the shape in general is cheerful and pleasing in a way that is more timeless than even more overt retro crap (Thunderbird), and it came in bright colors. Yeah, it was essentially a Golf with less headroom and storage space and needed replacement bulbs to be bought by the gross, but as you mention, it was fun in the way normal people want at a reasonable price normal people could afford in a daily driver mobile (though, still a VW, so “daily driver” is relative). I never cared that it wasn’t rear-engined because there’s no way it would be and I never had any particular fondness for the original after a very young age to feel there was some kind of insult there.
Just want to say that while I mostly share your distaste for that Thunderbird, I’ve always thought they would make an epic-looking LSR car.
I actually think there’s a good looking car hiding in there in a kind of speedster/’50s sports racer look (not too far from an LSR look) and it is RWD and I’m sure a manual could be put in it, but IMO, it’s too much work for what’s a lackluster driving car by most accounts. I was more disappointed by it than anything because it’s not terrible, it’s just got too much retro crap, especially in the front—headlights give it the look of the Overly Attached Girlfriend meme (the part that gives me the most trouble on how I would fix it as a garage DIYer) and the cheesy retro chrome grille with the goofy foglight ode-to-Dagmars gave it a short shelf life instead of its own staying power that could have harkened back, but still been its own thing (like the Mustang, though in fairness, that didn’t need to be resuscitated like the T-bird).
Not my thing, but I was happy when they came out as retro wasn’t (yet) a source of cringe (Thunderbird), the shape in general is cheerful and pleasing in a way that is more timeless than even more overt retro crap (Thunderbird), and it came in bright colors. Yeah, it was essentially a Golf with less headroom and storage space and needed replacement bulbs to be bought by the gross, but as you mention, it was fun in the way normal people want at a reasonable price normal people could afford in a daily driver mobile (though, still a VW, so “daily driver” is relative). I never cared that it wasn’t rear-engined because there’s no way it would be and I never had any particular fondness for the original after a very young age to feel there was some kind of insult there.
Just want to say that while I mostly share your distaste for that Thunderbird, I’ve always thought they would make an epic-looking LSR car.
I actually think there’s a good looking car hiding in there in a kind of speedster/’50s sports racer look (not too far from an LSR look) and it is RWD and I’m sure a manual could be put in it, but IMO, it’s too much work for what’s a lackluster driving car by most accounts. I was more disappointed by it than anything because it’s not terrible, it’s just got too much retro crap, especially in the front—headlights give it the look of the Overly Attached Girlfriend meme (the part that gives me the most trouble on how I would fix it as a garage DIYer) and the cheesy retro chrome grille with the goofy foglight ode-to-Dagmars gave it a short shelf life instead of its own staying power that could have harkened back, but still been its own thing (like the Mustang, though in fairness, that didn’t need to be resuscitated like the T-bird).
Respect is earned, not given. The New Beetle is retro without adding anything new (let’s take a Golf and reduce its interior space and cargo capacity). Was it more fuel efficient? Was it a better value? Was it faster? Nope, it just tugged at Boomer’s heartstrings, as all failed retro vehicles of that era did (PT Cruiser, Prowler, SSR, HHR).
Jalopnik agrees
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAnu2sUOeVw
Here’s the weird part: The New Beetle, HHR, and PT Cruiser weren’t really failed vehicles.
The New Beetle sold 1,163,890 units between 1997 and 2010. Sales were strong at first, but started falling off by 2005. By the time PT Cruiser sales ended in 2010, Chrysler moved over 1.3 million units. Even the HHR sold well until the Great Recession hit. Sure, people hated these cars on the internet, but there’s a reason you can still find these cars around. 🙂
I don’t know about the back seat, but the front seating is well known to accommodate people to large to fit into any other car.
I quite like the later more stretched out version.
Point of order: Not all of Jalopnik agreed. Andy was wrong and hates fun, and DaSilva (pushing back in that video) was right.
Not everything needs to max out on practicality to have value. The New Beetle was a hit in its era with more than just boomers. I thought it did a better job than many from that era of calling back without feeling like a weird imitation of the past.
(Hell, as Mercedes already noted, the PT Cruiser was also a sales hit before it lingered on past its welcome. Selling people cars they want is kind of the point of a car company.)
For real. I wonder how many of the people making these sorts of arguments against the Beetle would lodge the same complaints against a sports car, as if making compromises for performance is perfectly acceptable but not for fun or style.
I also feel like a lot of people who make these arguments tend to be younger? I lived through that era and the PT Cruiser, New Beetle and Mini were EVERYWHERE for a while. You could make an argument that the SSR and Prowler were weird niche products and/or half-baked (in the Prowler’s case in particular), and that the HHR was too late to the party, but those other three were legitimate hits while they were fresh.
Respect is earned, not given. The New Beetle is retro without adding anything new (let’s take a Golf and reduce its interior space and cargo capacity). Was it more fuel efficient? Was it a better value? Was it faster? Nope, it just tugged at Boomer’s heartstrings, as all failed retro vehicles of that era did (PT Cruiser, Prowler, SSR, HHR).
Jalopnik agrees
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAnu2sUOeVw
Here’s the weird part: The New Beetle, HHR, and PT Cruiser weren’t really failed vehicles.
The New Beetle sold 1,163,890 units between 1997 and 2010. Sales were strong at first, but started falling off by 2005. By the time PT Cruiser sales ended in 2010, Chrysler moved over 1.3 million units. Even the HHR sold well until the Great Recession hit. Sure, people hated these cars on the internet, but there’s a reason you can still find these cars around. 🙂
I don’t know about the back seat, but the front seating is well known to accommodate people to large to fit into any other car.
I quite like the later more stretched out version.
Point of order: Not all of Jalopnik agreed. Andy was wrong and hates fun, and DaSilva (pushing back in that video) was right.
Not everything needs to max out on practicality to have value. The New Beetle was a hit in its era with more than just boomers. I thought it did a better job than many from that era of calling back without feeling like a weird imitation of the past.
(Hell, as Mercedes already noted, the PT Cruiser was also a sales hit before it lingered on past its welcome. Selling people cars they want is kind of the point of a car company.)
For real. I wonder how many of the people making these sorts of arguments against the Beetle would lodge the same complaints against a sports car, as if making compromises for performance is perfectly acceptable but not for fun or style.
I also feel like a lot of people who make these arguments tend to be younger? I lived through that era and the PT Cruiser, New Beetle and Mini were EVERYWHERE for a while. You could make an argument that the SSR and Prowler were weird niche products and/or half-baked (in the Prowler’s case in particular), and that the HHR was too late to the party, but those other three were legitimate hits while they were fresh.
I like these, though I prefer the New New Beetle, especially in convertible form. My favorite take on the New Beetle is the Smyth Ute conversion. Not only does it look great, but it evokes those odd little original Beetle pickup conversions from the 60s and 70s that had a small flatbed suspended above an open engine compartment. Remember them? I loved those things.
The New Beetle was stylistically a worthy successor to the original and its too bad VWs quality/reliability issues blackened its reputation. I’m given to understand that many, if not all, of the car’s significant problems had been corrected by the last few years of its production, but maybe too late. On the plus side, a bad rep could keep prices low for those willing to risk it. I’d consider buying one. Need more whimsy.
Same here. I know a lot of people disagree, but I thought the “Beetle” (the new New Beetle) did a better job of channeling the original’s lines. Also liked the dash more.
They made awesome looking rally cars for that short-lived televised rally series in the ’10s; I want to say Travis Pastrana drove one, but I could be confusing him with someone else.
I like these, though I prefer the New New Beetle, especially in convertible form. My favorite take on the New Beetle is the Smyth Ute conversion. Not only does it look great, but it evokes those odd little original Beetle pickup conversions from the 60s and 70s that had a small flatbed suspended above an open engine compartment. Remember them? I loved those things.
The New Beetle was stylistically a worthy successor to the original and its too bad VWs quality/reliability issues blackened its reputation. I’m given to understand that many, if not all, of the car’s significant problems had been corrected by the last few years of its production, but maybe too late. On the plus side, a bad rep could keep prices low for those willing to risk it. I’d consider buying one. Need more whimsy.
Same here. I know a lot of people disagree, but I thought the “Beetle” (the new New Beetle) did a better job of channeling the original’s lines. Also liked the dash more.
They made awesome looking rally cars for that short-lived televised rally series in the ’10s; I want to say Travis Pastrana drove one, but I could be confusing him with someone else.
They should have upgraded the timing belt to a timing chain. And it should have been rear engine, rear-drive.
Everything the OG Beetle did right, this car got so wrong. I see more OG Beetles on the roads than this thing, and that tells me something given the age difference.
Ugh, a Tracyite timing chain supremacist.
WE ARE LEGION
JOIN US
They should have upgraded the timing belt to a timing chain. And it should have been rear engine, rear-drive.
Everything the OG Beetle did right, this car got so wrong. I see more OG Beetles on the roads than this thing, and that tells me something given the age difference.
Ugh, a Tracyite timing chain supremacist.
WE ARE LEGION
JOIN US
I was a VW-obsessed kid at the time, born in 1993. Even I remember the hype, and I was enamored with them. Air cooled VWs had long since departed the roads in Kentucky by the time I came on the scene, so seeing New Beetles was almost as good. I ended up with an air cooled Beetle of my own when I was 11, a 1972 Super Beetle that I still own and drive today. Looking back, I like that the Beetle was fun, a function over form car. If you wanted practicality, you could just buy the Golf on which the Beetle was based.
When my best friends Prius finally bit the dust a couple years ago, she wanted a Beetle. We spent a lot of time as teenagers riding around in my Beetle, and she finally wanted one of her own. Her budget wasn’t huge, but I did steer her away from the first iteration of New Beetle. I didn’t want her getting hit with all the problems the MKIV VWs were known for. She got a 2012 model instead, with the 2.5 per my recommendation. I didn’t want her getting hit with VW’s 2.0T problems either. It’s a nice little car. Rides on VW’s MKV Golf platform, one of my favorites and the same one that underpins my Sportwagen, so I know they drive well. I like how they got rid of the huge expanse of dashboard for the second iteration, it’s more reminiscent of the flat dashboard that most old Beetles had. Interestingly, the bud vase wasn’t a standard feature on those. After looking for a long time, I finally found a new in box bud vase for that generation of Beetle, which was my birthday present to my friend last year.
I wonder how a refreshed New Beetle would do today. Sales numbers dropped significantly in the latter years of the New Beetle, but spiked higher than ever in 2012 when the new one came out. But man, we could really do with some fun, friendly looking cars in today’s automotive landscape.
I was a VW-obsessed kid at the time, born in 1993. Even I remember the hype, and I was enamored with them. Air cooled VWs had long since departed the roads in Kentucky by the time I came on the scene, so seeing New Beetles was almost as good. I ended up with an air cooled Beetle of my own when I was 11, a 1972 Super Beetle that I still own and drive today. Looking back, I like that the Beetle was fun, a function over form car. If you wanted practicality, you could just buy the Golf on which the Beetle was based.
When my best friends Prius finally bit the dust a couple years ago, she wanted a Beetle. We spent a lot of time as teenagers riding around in my Beetle, and she finally wanted one of her own. Her budget wasn’t huge, but I did steer her away from the first iteration of New Beetle. I didn’t want her getting hit with all the problems the MKIV VWs were known for. She got a 2012 model instead, with the 2.5 per my recommendation. I didn’t want her getting hit with VW’s 2.0T problems either. It’s a nice little car. Rides on VW’s MKV Golf platform, one of my favorites and the same one that underpins my Sportwagen, so I know they drive well. I like how they got rid of the huge expanse of dashboard for the second iteration, it’s more reminiscent of the flat dashboard that most old Beetles had. Interestingly, the bud vase wasn’t a standard feature on those. After looking for a long time, I finally found a new in box bud vase for that generation of Beetle, which was my birthday present to my friend last year.
I wonder how a refreshed New Beetle would do today. Sales numbers dropped significantly in the latter years of the New Beetle, but spiked higher than ever in 2012 when the new one came out. But man, we could really do with some fun, friendly looking cars in today’s automotive landscape.
I’ve never considered driving one, but I appreciate them for what they are. Unlike a lot of retro-inspired designs, this was a good balance of new and old. You knew it was a throwback, but it didn’t insult you with the cues. Or maybe I just don’t take them too seriously. It’s odd that vintage VWs get a lot of appreciation but the new bugs get a lot of derision.
I’ve never considered driving one, but I appreciate them for what they are. Unlike a lot of retro-inspired designs, this was a good balance of new and old. You knew it was a throwback, but it didn’t insult you with the cues. Or maybe I just don’t take them too seriously. It’s odd that vintage VWs get a lot of appreciation but the new bugs get a lot of derision.
I rode in one with a guy who seemed to have (poorly) learned his shifting by watching The Fast and the Furious, and I will forever associate the car with that unpleasant experience. When he was grinding gears trying to race shift, he insisted that it was okay and he couldn’t hurt the transmission on it because of some features I don’t think he understood (and I didn’t know what he was even talking about).
I occasionally see one for sale and have considered the convertible, but I always remember them as driving and handling poorly, even though it wasn’t the poor car’s fault. Maybe I’ll give one a try sometime. It deserves a fair shake.
I rode in one with a guy who seemed to have (poorly) learned his shifting by watching The Fast and the Furious, and I will forever associate the car with that unpleasant experience. When he was grinding gears trying to race shift, he insisted that it was okay and he couldn’t hurt the transmission on it because of some features I don’t think he understood (and I didn’t know what he was even talking about).
I occasionally see one for sale and have considered the convertible, but I always remember them as driving and handling poorly, even though it wasn’t the poor car’s fault. Maybe I’ll give one a try sometime. It deserves a fair shake.