This Brochure Picture Of A Beetle Convertible Is Very Weird And I Think I Found Something Amazing: Cold Start

Cs Beetleconvert Brochure
ADVERTISEMENT

So yesterday when I was doing a bit of research for my article about car badging, and especially Volkswagen’s strange badging habits, I happened to come across this 1968 brochure and noticed something peculiar about the convertible Beetle shown in the photo there. Two details that are very confusing, especially in the context of being on a picture in an official VW-sanctioned publication like a brochure. I think what I’m seeing here, for the first time, and, notably, something I’ve never read about referenced online, is a pre-production version of the 1968 Beetle that was different from the production one, but late enough in the game to be used in brochure and advertising shoots. Let me show you what I mean.

Cs Beetle68 Vertweird

Here’s the two key parts: first, the location of the VOLKSWAGEN badge is horizontal, right above the license plate light housing. No Beetle ever came from the factory with the badge like that! And the taillights, they seem too small and too low. 1968 was a big year for Beetle taillights, as this was the first time a reverse lamp was integrated into the main taillight, forming a sort of tombstone-shaped design.

But it’s not just this picture! This very morning, I was looking at another 1968 brochure, and saw this:

Cs Beetle68 Weird

This looks to be a sedan version of this same pre-production series, with the horizontal badge and taillights that look a bit smaller, maybe even a bit more rounded at the base, and lower-set. These look more like adaptations from the earlier 1962-1967 taillight. For comparison, here’s a 1968 VW press pic of the rear of the Beetle:

Cs Beetle68 Press

See the badge angle? And the size/shape/location of the taillights? Those brochure pics are definitely some not-final pre-production Beetles!

That’s why Cold Start is late today! Because this is an amazing discovery! A pre-pro ’68 Beetle, just out there in plain sight! Do they give Nobel Prizes for this stuff? Probably.

35 thoughts on “This Brochure Picture Of A Beetle Convertible Is Very Weird And I Think I Found Something Amazing: Cold Start

  1. So which iteration of Beetle tail lamps are your fav? My dad had an eggshell ’68 and I loved those elegant tail lamps. My mom had an orange ’74, and I disliked the large, roundish tail lamps.

  2. How about the location of the top down roof? I have never seen a convertible where the top down splash over the body and sticks this far out.

  3. I wonder if the the physical car had the older taillights and the brochure photos just airbrushed over them to add the appearance of a reverse light.

  4. in ’68 you didn’t need to have the Lawyers involved to add the disclaimer: ‘Pre-production car, European model shown, options added, professional driver, closed course’ at the bottom

    1. ’68s always had an unvented decklid in the sedans. Convertibles had the two grilles, and by 1970 those became standard across the line. In ’72 it changed to four groups of slots.

      1. Gracias! I thought ’67 was the last year for the solid decklid, then it went to two from ’68-’71. My ’72 Super had four, so I got that one right. 🙂

  5. And then there is the elephant in the room – the giant fabric wing that is the Beetle convertible top. I know why it is that big but that doesn’t make it less ridiculous.

    1. It was a German thing, with the top up, inside it didn’t look like a convertible.
      No canvas and exposed frame thing, the drawback was the folded appearance like a wedge shaped mattress. I don’t know about the aerodynamics.
      Good for parades though, I should note Adolf Hitlers parade car, the first convertible, had a simple top and therefore lacked this “cheerleader perch”. It did have different engine venting too.

        1. ” I should note Adolf Hitlers parade car, the first convertible, had a simple top and therefore lacked this “cheerleader perch…”

          “Hitler was always venting about something.”

          Of course he was angry, having to sit up there on the top of the back of the car like that – the backseat was too cramped and Hitler demanded Lebensraum

      1. Compare to the Morris Minor convertible, which is delightfully halfassed (halfarsed?) having not just a single layer canvas top but full sedan-type framed door windows and (after the first couple years with side curtains in back) framed fixed glass rear quarter windows.

        Granted, you paid for German thoroughness – a Beetle and Minor (2-door) sedan cost about the same in the US during the early,1958-59 import boom but the VW convertible, semi-coachbuilt by Karmann, cost half again as much as a sedan while the Morris convertible was either the same price or some years cost less than its’ 2-door sedan counterpart.

    2. The Karmann convertible roof has three layers: Inner roof, a thick insulating “mattress” and the outer roof skin. AND a glass rear screen. Drove mine in -15c (dont know how much that is in ounces..) and didn’t get cold. A whole different thing than the usual soft tops on 1960ies roadsters like Alfa, Fiat or the Spitfire (owned all 3). So takes up some space folded down. You can flip the rear mirror to look over it 😉

      1. Yeah, it really was a properly constructed convertible top, better quality and more effort than they probably needed for a small economy car, but they did it anyway. Which was a philosophy that explains a key part of the Beetle’s appeal

      2. Can confirm, I could drive with the top down in my step-father’s 68 in colder temps than in the three BMW convertibles I’ve owned. I found a wind blocker in the BMWs let you go down about 10 degrees colder and still be comfortable, and that’s that’s pretty much what the VW top folded back is – a giant windblocker.

  6. As a former Beetle owner (1970, my first car) I wholly endorse a series exploring VW weirdness. Plus there’s the Muir “How to Keep Your Volkswagen Alive” manual, which besides helping teenage me learn to wrench it was a hell of a fun read, especially the illustrations.

Leave a Reply